| 摘要: |
| 2014年8月7日WTO就“美国、欧盟、日本诉中国稀土、钨、钼相关产品出口管理措施
案”正式公布了上诉机构报告，持续数年的稀土案以中国败诉落幕。相关措施如何在
资源与环境保护方面获得WTO认可？稀土案的裁决过程充分体现了WTO 对“合理性
援引”GATT1994第20条的要求。对于中国而言，“合理性援引”GATT1994第20条是
此后解决类似争端必须恪守的准则。同时，在WTO动态发展的框架下，我们并不能因
为在某个具体案例中失利就减少全面理性审视并助推WTO机制公正及合理性的相关考
量和努力。 |
| 关键词: 稀土案 合理性援引 “入世”议定书 GATT1994第20条 |
| DOI： |
|
| 基金项目: |
|
| Speculations on “Reasonable Invoking” in the Preliminary Decision ofthe Rare Earth Case |
| LI Ben,SONG Li-na |
|
| Abstract: |
| On 7 August 2014, the Appellate Body issued three Appellate Body Reports in one single document
on China-measures related to the exportation of rare earths, tungsten, and molybdenum. These reports declare
that the Rare Earth Case which lasted for years ends in failure. How does the related measures obtain recognition
on resources and environment form the WTO? The decision-making on this case shows that the WTO claims
reasonable invoking on Article 20 of GATT1994. As for China, it should abide by reasonable invoking on Article 20
of GATT1994 to deal with similar disputes in future. At the same time, under the framework of the WTO’s dynamic
development, the failure in specific case should not make an mitigation on China’s consideration and efforts to
survey and propel an equitable and rational mechanism of the WTO |
| Key words: Rare Earth case reasonable invoking Accession Protocol to the WTO Article 20 of GATT1994 |
