| 摘要: |
| 在国际货物销售合同纠纷中，争议解决费用往往是不可忽视的内容。在此基础之上，探讨 CISG视角下的争议解决费用分摊问题兼具理论和实际意义。理论和实践中就CISG能否成为分摊争议解决费用的依据存在不同做法。差异背后的深层次原因在于有关方对 CISG的立法精神和解释规则存在理解上的不同。本文支持依 CISG分摊争议解决费用的观点，因为这不仅更契合于公约的精神，也更能实现公约适用的统一。域外的相关公约实践对我国同样具有借鉴意义。对于我国的有关实践，本文有 4点建议：通过合同条款对争议解决费用的分摊加以明确；明确争议解决费用分摊的请求权基础；裁判主体应克服国内法思维，恪守公约精神进行条款的解释与适用；进一步明确争议解决费用分摊的国内法规则，从而实现国际法与国内法适用的统一。 |
| 关键词: CISG 律师费 诉讼费 仲裁费 分摊 |
| DOI： |
|
| 基金项目: |
|
| Recovering Dispute Resolution Fees as Damages under CISG |
| WANG Hui |
|
| Abstract: |
| In the context of international sale of goods contract disputes, dispute resolution fees have accounted for an unneglectable part of the whole case input. Therefore, whether or not the dispute resolution fees are recoverable under CISG has become of both theoretical and practical value. As a result of different understandings over CISG’s legislative intent and interpretation method, there exist different approaches as to the above-mentioned issue. This article votes for the recoverability of disputes resolution fees as damages under CISG. It fits for uniform application of CISG, which is valued by the convention. Inspired by ex-territorial CISG legal practices, the author proposes four suggestions respectively. Firstly, it is wise to clarify the dispute resolution fees as recoverable loss through contracts by party autonomy. Secondly, it is necessary to make clear the legal basis for dispute resolution fees allocation. Thirdly, it is required to apply and interpret CISG in accordance with its legislative intent and spirit. Fourthly, it is suggested to amend and specify domestic legal principle on dispute resolution fees allocation for sake of unification between international law and domestic law. |
| Key words: CISG attorney fee litigation cost arbitration cost allocation |
