| 摘要: |
| 巴塞尔资本协议作为“跨国监管网络”的典范，理应具有政治中立的特点，但实证研
究表明，不论是资本协议Ⅰ、资本协议Ⅱ，还是新近推出的资本协议Ⅲ，都深受国际
关系和大国政治的影响，其本质上还是政治博弈的产物。各国对资本协议实施水平
参差不齐，概与国内政治环境、经济发展水平和金融监管环境密切相关。作为发展中
国家和经济转型期的中国，宜对资本协议Ⅲ的实施采取理性审慎的态度，实施的程度和
步伐应与国内监管环境相适应，防止对中国银行的中长期盈利性和国际竞争力带来负面
影响。 |
| 关键词: 巴塞尔资本协议Ⅲ 跨国监管网络 金融监管 |
| DOI： |
|
| 基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究基金规划项目“ 金融危机后贸易保护主义的应对： 从国际金融法的视角”
（ 1 0 Y J A 8 2 0 0 3 1 ） 。 |
|
| The Basel Framework as Transnational Regulatory Network |
| HE Yi |
|
| Abstract: |
| The Basel Ⅲ Framework, hailed as an example of Transnational Regulatory Network(TRN), is supposed
to be politically neutral and its distributionless regulatory coordination shall benefit the international community
as a whole. However, empirical studies show that the Basel Ⅲ is deeply subject to international relations and the
power’s political pressure just as did the Basel Ⅰ/Ⅱ. The degree of implementation varies considerably in different
countries, in align with their domestic political and regulatory environments. As a developing country and the
largest transitional economy, China shall maintain a rational and scrupulous attitude towards Basel Ⅲ and the way
of implementation shall be in proportionate to China’s regulatory environment. Pursuit of the quickly-changing
high norms can be hazardous to the profitability and international competitiveness of Chinese banks in the long run |
| Key words: Basel Ⅲ transnational regulatory network financial regulation |
